Recovering Wasted Energy Expense Is a $750 Billion Opportunity

June 25, 2013 By Robert Roth, CEO, BGZ, Inc.


According to the US Department of Energy (DOE), more than 4.2 million commercial buildings waste an average 30% of the energy that owners and tenants pay for. During 2007 (latest figures), the DOE estimated the cost of that waste at $60.7 billion.At an 8.0% capitalization rate, $60.7 billion of wasted energy expense represents $750 billion of lost asset value. For an individual building, the potential value of recovered energy waste is illustrated by this Energy Star example:
In a 200,000-square foot office building that pays $2 per square foot in energy, a 10% reduction in energy cost translates into $40,000 in additional net operating income. At an 8.0% cap rate, new-found NOI translates into $500,000 in increased asset value.

Our recent energy assessments, in 90 commercial buildings, have typically identified cost recovery opportunities ranging from 20% to 40%. Applying those findings to the preceding Energy Star example:

A 20% reduction in energy cost translates into a $1.0 million increase in asset value.
A 30% reduction translates into a $1.5 million increase in asset value.
Given this potential to translate wasted energy expense into new-found income and asset value, it seems odd that very few commercial real estate owners are investing in energy efficiency improvements.

Lack of Owner Initiative is Curious

With $750 billion in asset value “missing in action,” it is curious that very few property owners have taken steps to recover it.

A Deloitte survey, reSources 2012, found that 90% of companies surveyed had energy management goals; and more than two-thirds identified reducing energy cost as their primary motive. Yet, the survey also found that very few companies have made significant energy efficiency improvements.

Making a similar point, a recent McGraw-Hill Construction report notes that: “Despite the fact that retrofit activity remained active during the down economy, only a tiny portion of the U.S. building stock has been affected.” (Source: Business Case for Energy Efficient Building Retrofit and Renovation – 2011)

The obvious question is, “Why are commercial real estate owners reticent to reduce their energy bills?”

Energy Efficiency Is Mysterious

In working with property owners, we have found that lack of proactivity in recovering wasted energy expense is generally the result of three (incorrect) assumptions:

  • Improving energy efficiency a complex, mysterious and unreliable process.
  • Investing in energy efficiency is expensive.
  • Investing in energy efficiency is risky business (due to overpromise and under delivery).
  • These assumptions are proving incorrect as owners and their facility managers are taking control of energy cost through a simple 5-Step process, enabled by cloud-based software.

Reducing Energy Expense is a Process

Reducing energy bills is not a one-time event (such as an “energy audit” or “energy assessment”). It is a process.

When owners and managers keep this process SIMPLE, by using self-guiding cloud-based software, they drive down energy cost with minimal (and sometimes no) capital investment.

A Simple Energy Cost-Reduction Process

1. Take Charge of Energy Bills

In most commercial properties energy bills are higher than necessary because no one is in charge of reducing them. No one is setting annual dollar or percentage cost reduction goals.

When owners take charge, by setting goals, energy cost savings happen.

2. Perform a Hands On Energy Assessment

The information provided by a hands-on commercial energy assessment is critical for making energy efficiency investment decisions.

Benchmark data from Energy Star or a “virtual” or “zero touch” energy audit may indicate whether a given building’s energy efficiency is “good, bad or ugly.” But, making sound investment decisions requires a hands-on audit.

3. Identify Alternative Solutions

To obtain the best ROI (return on investment), an owner needs to consider the costs and benefits of a full range of potential solutions.

Obtaining accurate cost and benefit information requires collaboration with local contractors.

4. Evaluate Costs and Benefits

Identifying the best energy efficiency investments, consistent with an owner’s budget and ROI objectives, requires comparing the costs and financial benefits of alternative solutions.

5. Prepare a Professional Recommendation

All of the work done in the preceding four steps is of little value if it is not reduced to a simple, professional recommendation. Cloud-based software makes summarizing the work done in Steps 1 – 4, and preparing a recommendation in Step 5, SIMPLE.

Dr. Bob Roth is CEO of BGZ, Inc., developers of EnergyActio software. EnergyActio is listed in the US Department of Energy Software Guide. EnergyActio is solving the energy audit conundrum by giving owners and tenants what they want . . . a hands-on investigation . . . a thorough evaluation of efficiency options . . . and a financial investment recommendation based on real project costs and energy cost-savings estimates (from local contractors who are willing to have their feet held to the fire). For more information, and to take a free test drive, visit , or contact

Upcoming Events & Seminars

More Events »

Whipp Tips & News

Switch IPO the latest to limit investor voting rights

As many of 15 percent of U.S. IPOs in recent years have used dual share classes meant to give insiders outsized voting rights, according to the Council of Institutional Investors.

Details »

Wells Fargo executives, board must face lawsuit over fake accounts, federal judge says

Details »

As Ford pushes into electric vehicles, U.S. union aims to save jobs

Ford’s presentation to investors this week under new chief executive Jim Hackett, included a slide touting a 30 percent reduction in “hours per unit” to build electric vehicles.

Details »

More News »

The information in this website was obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, we cannot guarantee that the information is accurate or complete. The information provided is a general source of information and should not be considered personal investment advice or solicitation to buy or sell securities.

Leede Jones Gable Inc. is a
Member of IIROC and the Canadian Investor Protection Fund
Stephen Whipp is a member of the Responsible Investment Association